Re: [BLAST_ANAWARE] cvs and version of reconstruction for user blast

From: zhangchi (zhangchi@general.lns.mit.edu)
Date: Thu May 08 2003 - 14:53:44 EDT


OOPS, I already branched off b2_19 for preparation of migration to v3. The
point it branched off was tagget r2_19. I would prefer 2_19 be
reserved for this branch. and make the next tag on main chunk v2_20.

On Thu, 8 May 2003, Tancredi Botto wrote:

>
> chis,
> the v2.18a, v2.18b, v2.18c versions won't be rigidly associated with the
> code. But once a v2.19 is available it wont' be difficult to guess the
> order! Anyway, I hope to get back to work soon (pun)
>
>
> > yeah, that sounds good, as long as we get rid of the abc versions after
> > consolidating them in a new tag so they don't stick around and create
> > entropy/confuse us.
> >
> >
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:29 EST