Re: [BLAST_ANAWARE] TOF xsection - wrong plot!

From: Tancredi Botto (tancredi@mitlns.mit.edu)
Date: Mon Jun 23 2003 - 12:09:22 EDT


-- 
________________________________________________________________________________
Tancredi Botto,  		phone: +1-617-253-9204  mobile: +1-978-490-4124
research scientist		MIT/Bates, 21 Manning Av    Middleton MA, 01949
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, Tancredi Botto wrote:

> > I just realized that I left a wrong plot in the logbook. Also the > rate during the last batch of ABS runs (700-800) is consistent with a > flow in the cell of M=2, not M=1. I.e. molecular. > > Using the tof elastic filter it is very quick to do tof-only > analysis where the reconstruction efficiency must be high. The main > difference is that the timing cuts are truly cuts now: 40-60 channels (2-3 > ns) at max, not 100-200.. Doing that and with an ADC cut, tof coplanarity > most always turns out ok automatically. > > >From data of this weekend I "determined" the ABS flow comparing > TOF rates for ABS runs and unpol runs (where the flow is known and > is known to all go into the cell). The ABS flow (single spin state) > is 1.6E16 At/s which is close to expected. > > With that flow and (similarly determined) gas temperature (120 +- 10K) I > compare the expected cross section (montecarlo) with the L/R tof data > after an adc cut, as a function of tof number. The normalization is done > on the montecarlo curve, and the difference between M=1 and M=2 is shown. > >




This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:29 EST