> > 1132-1139 1142-1143 (spin flipping and covers off)
>
> all of these runs has Gas Flow = 0.0 in e-log. how am I suppose to compare
> cross sections and counts to Monte Carlo with this?
you can only check from the logbook. I believe it was 0.05. On the other
hand 0.0 or empty-field are nearly the same.
> On the other hand I do see runs: 1057-1077 for unpol D2 runs with
> Gas Flow = 0.1, seems really high but shall I assume it is correct?
see above. I understand this sounds "bad" but I have nothing else to
offer. It is not a virtue of elog or paperbook.
If somebody takes data and doesn't write the target thickness in
whichever way, whay am I to say ? My guess is as good as yours.
P.S.
The last alternative is to look at ligit in the file, and/or mfc value
in epics. See scaler/epics ntuple (in scaler.C)
> By the way, when I browse http://blast.lns.mit.edu/elog/ for June's run,
> anytime e-log is refreshed, the web page reloads in netscape and takes me
> back to the top. any chance to make it static?
>
> Chi
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:29 EST