hi tancredi,
i outright deleted lrn.C, since it is archived in cvs, and is already
out of date. i don't want people making changes to it without checking
them in. you can get it with 'cvs up -r 1.35 lrn.C'. if we ever need
to use it as a script again, i think the thing to do is make 'lrn.cc'
runable as a script as well as compilable, so that we're not maintaining
two copies of the same code.
i also made some improvements to flrn.C, so that you can use names
like 'pwl' instead of 'fill[93]', and so that you can do more than one
file at a time. i also updated the ntuple variables to be current with
'lrn.cc'; i'll check it in as soon as it is tested.
--chris
Tancredi Botto wrote:
>Aron,
>there is no right or wrong. As said
>
>utils/lrn.C is a script.
>
>~v3/lrn is a compiled code (lrn.cc)
>
>both are right but only lrn is "supported" or upgraded. As said
>you should analyze in v3. I'll move lrn.C out of path.
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:29 EST