Re: [BLAST_ANAWARE] dst/crunch update V: crunching going on spuds

From: Adrian T Sindile (asindile@cisunix.unh.edu)
Date: Sat Jan 03 2004 - 21:15:44 EST


Hi, Chi!
I have a few questions about the new version of BlastLib:

1) is PID reliable yet? Using V2_96 on the first 2000 events of run 3691 I
get 7 (seven) e-p coincidence events. Using V3 I get none, for the same
events and run number;

2) is the nsed one gets from CVS (I followed Chris' email to get stuff)
OK? I am asking it because I am able to reproduce its results with my
cruncher, so if nsed is correct, why don't I get the results I was getting
with V2_96? Maybe I am doing something wrong - could you verify the same
run number and tell me if you get results consistent with V2_96?

3) In the run number I mentioned above, I was getting lots of PID 42 and
43 - I did not look too deep (I am sure they are named someplace in the
codes) but on the CERN webpage there is no particle for 42 and 43... what
are those particles?

With the hope this might help debugging V3 or at least answering my own
questions... Thank you!

Adrian

-------------------------------
Adrian Sindile
Research Assistant
Nuclear Physics Group
University of New Hampshire
phone: (603)862-1691
FAX: (603)862-2998
email: asindile@alberti.unh.edu
http://einstein.unh.edu/~adrian/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:30 EST