Hi, Tancredi!
To avoid all this mess, extra effort and possibilities of mistakes etc., I
would propose keeping pro2003 as the "batchname"...
In doing so, 2003 would have the meaning (and honor) of being the year
when BLAST started giving good physics data. I had advocated having run
numbers only in the MySQL database just to avoid this - but people thought
we might want to reset run numbers and start from run #1 every now and
then... Well, having big run numbers is surely better than having
different directories, environment variables, CODA sessions, adapting
TOpt, changing the RUN table etc.
My two cents...
Adrian
-------------------------------
Adrian Sindile
Research Assistant
Nuclear Physics Group
University of New Hampshire
phone: (603)862-1691
FAX: (603)862-2998
email: asindile@alberti.unh.edu
http://einstein.unh.edu/~adrian/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:30 EST