Re: [BLAST_ANAWARE] A quick question

From: Baris Tonguc (btonguc@MIT.EDU)
Date: Thu Feb 05 2004 - 18:17:48 EST


Hi, Adrian's assumption was right. I have chained a number of runs from
2700. For each run I got same error message and I ended up w/ no runs.

Run sizes are comparable w/ recent runs too.

Thanks,
Baris

----- Original Message -----
From: "Adrian T Sindile" <asindile@cisunix.unh.edu>
To: "Chris Crawford" <chris2@lns.mit.edu>
Cc: "Baris Tonguc" <btonguc@MIT.EDU>; "Blast_Anaware"
<Blast_anaware@rocko.mit.edu>
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 5:48 PM
Subject: Re: [BLAST_ANAWARE] A quick question

> Hi, Baris, Chris...
> Maybe the link thing I mentioned previously does not have anything to do
> with this, but I saw the same for links some time ago.
> I checked and there are indeed links there (see below).
> But Chris might be right. I assumed Baris tried more than one run around
> 2700, so it would be unlikely to have lots of them useless... but maybe
> indeed more than one run crashed before crunching completely...
>
> <spud8:26> ls -l /net/data/4/Analysis/
> total 284
> drwxr-xr-x 2 blast blast 4096 Dec 1 14:57 autocrunchdir/
> drwxr-xr-x 2 blast blast 4096 Aug 30 2002 blastmc/
> drwxrwxrwx 5 blast blast 36864 Oct 1 19:38 commis/
> drwxr-xr-x 14 blast blast 237568 Feb 5 15:57 data/
> drwxr-xr-x 2 blast blast 4096 Oct 1 19:42 phase1/
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 daqstore daqstore 4 Feb 5 15:39 pro2003 -> data/
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 daqstore daqstore 4 Feb 5 15:39 pro2004 -> data/
>
> A quick check might show if the pro2003 link is to blame.
> Hope this helps.
>
> Cheers!
> Adrian
>
>
> On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Chris Crawford wrote:
>
> > hi baris,
> > the crunching probably crashed half way through, so that the file
> > exists, but is useless. check the file size compared to the raw data.
> > --chris
> >
> > Baris Tonguc wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > I wanted to look at runs around 2700. But my script gives me errors as
> > > if they were not lr crunched. However, I verified the existence of
> > > corresponding crunched files at the analysis directory. On the other
> > > hand, when I have run the same script on recent runs (let's say 4000
> > > series), I am fine. I guess I don't understand why the script does not
> > > work w/ relatively older runs. Your comments are appreciated.
> > >
> > > The error message is below:
> > >
> > > root -l adc-draw.C 2741
> > > root [0]
> > > Processing adc-draw.C...
> > > Warning in <TFile::Init>: file
/net/data/4/Analysis/pro2003//lr-2741.root
> > > probably not closed, trying to recover
> > > Warning in <TFile::Init>: no keys recovered, file has been made a
Zombie
> > > error : dataset 0 has no run numbers(2)
> > >
> > > root [1]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Baris
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:30 EST