> Correction
>
> x = x0 + dx + k * pos_vs_t( wire, super, B, track angle, t0-tdc )
>
> Correction2
>
> x = x0 + dx + F[ pos_vs_t( wire, super, B, track angle, t0-tdc ) ]
where F could of course also be of type
a + k * pos_vs_t <- here a is still "interpretable" as a wire/time offset
a + k * pos_vs_t + kk * (pos_vs_t^2)
I am not advocating noise. But certainly we should look
at x_drift_calc vs x_drift and try to understand it.
cheers,
-t
Cheers,
>
> Douglas
>
> 26-415 M.I.T.
> Tel: +1 (617) 258-7199
> 77 Massachusetts Avenue Fax: +1 (617)
> 258-5440
> Cambridge, MA 02139, USA E-mail:
> hasell@mit.edu
> On Feb 6, 2004, at 5:07 PM, Wang Xu wrote:
>
> > Hi Chi,
> > Also please generate new Wire.Cal with K fator at the last column.
> > (where
> > d = K *averg drifting speed *(t-t0)+x0.)
> > Wang
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:30 EST