Hi guys,
I merge all my changes into BlastLib2 in this weekends. Adrian and
I will do some test for this codes. (I guess I change FBat into FSB when
I merge my codes)
Chi,
It is ok for Bats now since we will not analyze Bats data for D2
target. But we want to add all info. for Bats into Dst in future.
Best regards,
Wang
On Sun, 13 Jun 2004, Adrian T Sindile wrote:
> Hi, Chi!
> I guess a thorough BAT analysis will be done when we recrunch raw data
> files anyway. By then Wang will also have his BAT recon details finished
> (and a preliminary BAT analysis before the collaboration meeting, if I
> remember correctly what he said)... then the sooner the raw recrunch
> happens, the better in my opinion. For now a recrunch from DST
> will still give me better e-p event selection due to improved offsets.
>
> I finished my changes to the e-p event selection and I created the
> structure for the BATs (and their CCs) in ep_skim (inside both lrn and
> lrd).
> Any idea who changed fBat to fSB? I guess it does not matter now that
> much, just curious...
> Cheers!
>
> Adrian
>
> On Sun, 13 Jun 2004, Chi Zhang wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi, some bad news for BATS fans.
> >
> > 1. bats hits are not included in DST. there goes recrunch for BATS this
> > time. If you want bats, you ll have to recrunch from raw data. This is
> > because BATS are not linked to any tracks therefore not filled into DST.
> >
> > A few weeks ago, I implemented unmatched outer dectectors into DST, but I
> > did not include BATS because they were not online at the moment. That
> > change was on CVS head anyway so not ever used for blast account
> > crunching.
> >
> > 2. The recent check in from blast account causes seg-faults for a simple
> > reason, someone changed fBat to fSB, yet inside the root files, the branch
> > is called fBat. I have changed it back, please do not use fSB anymore
> > even though you might have a strong feeling toward that name.
> >
> > Chi
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:31 EST