Re: [BLAST_ANAWARE] T20 results up to 4 inverse fermi

From: John Calarco (jrc@einstein.unh.edu)
Date: Mon Jul 12 2004 - 10:41:29 EDT

Next message: Chi Zhang: "update with systematic errors Re: [BLAST_ANAWARE] T20 results up to 4 inverse fermi"
Previous message: Electronic Log Book: "[BLAST_SHIFTS] Shift summary 07/12/2004 A (1-9)"
In reply to: Chi Zhang: "[BLAST_ANAWARE] T20 results up to 4 inverse fermi"
Next in thread: Chi Zhang: "update with systematic errors Re: [BLAST_ANAWARE] T20 results up to 4 inverse fermi"
Reply: Chi Zhang: "update with systematic errors Re: [BLAST_ANAWARE] T20 results up to 4 inverse fermi"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Chi,

I have only one question rgarding your projection. It appears as
if the errors on the 3 highest Q points are all about the same size,
while the errors in both the proposal and the data taken to date
show an increase in the error with increasing Q. Can you explain?

John

-- 
John R. Calarco
Dept. of Physics
Univ. of New Hampshire
Durham, NH 03824
phone: (603)862-2088
FAX:   (603)862-2998
email: calarco@unh.edu

Next message: Chi Zhang: "update with systematic errors Re: [BLAST_ANAWARE] T20 results up to 4 inverse fermi"
Previous message: Electronic Log Book: "[BLAST_SHIFTS] Shift summary 07/12/2004 A (1-9)"
In reply to: Chi Zhang: "[BLAST_ANAWARE] T20 results up to 4 inverse fermi"
Next in thread: Chi Zhang: "update with systematic errors Re: [BLAST_ANAWARE] T20 results up to 4 inverse fermi"
Reply: Chi Zhang: "update with systematic errors Re: [BLAST_ANAWARE] T20 results up to 4 inverse fermi"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:31 EST