Re: [BLAST_ANAWARE] beginning to worry about quality of crunched runs and our listing

From: Tancredi Botto (tancredi@lns.mit.edu)
Date: Sat Jul 24 2004 - 23:34:55 EDT


checkfbus only checks for missing tdc, in lr. This is now a valid test
(until yesterday a positive check was only possible from raw)

The adc you can check only in raw:

/macros/Raw/raw_adccheck.C

but also tdc from raw, raw_tofcheck.C

admittedly could be done more cleanly but I am a bit busy with doe now.
You can of course start putting everything into a single code!
have fun
-- t
________________________________________________________________________________
Tancredi Botto, phone: +1-617-253-9204 mobile: +1-978-490-4124
research scientist MIT/Bates, 21 Manning Av Middleton MA, 01949
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

On Sat, 24 Jul 2004, Peter Karpius wrote:

> OK so the procedure should be to run checkfbus.C (this is now mandatory)
> prior to running show_deep_asym_all.C to avoid these runs missing
> adcs/tdcs?
>
> Pete
>
> ----------------------------------------------
> Pete Karpius
> Graduate Research Assistant
> Nuclear Physics Group
> University of New Hampshire
> phone: (603)862-1220
> FAX: (603)862-2998
> email: karpiusp@einstein.unh.edu
> http://pubpages.unh.edu/~pkarpius/homepage.htm
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:31 EST