Re: [BLAST_ANAWARE] "bad" charge-less pol deut runs listing since june 30th

From: Chi Zhang (zhangchi@MIT.EDU)
Date: Tue Aug 17 2004 - 22:11:01 EDT


Hi Aaron, thanks for the list. I checked it against my list and filled in
quite a few runs that I missed.

There are a couple runs in your list that I have question about:
        9045: very short, only 2C charge, not sure whether to include or not
        9098 9099 9101-9102: marked in RUNLIST WC right off
        9410: no elog or RUNLIST entry
        9483: ABS problem mid run, Vitaliy had an elog entry on this

Just for record, there are a dozen runs that in principle are good but lrn
did not register any ADC, codes has since changed so a recruch should fix
them:
        9242-9245 9247-9255 9258-9263

There are also runs I use that are not in the list. Part of them are bad
crunch before but were recrunched very recently as a test of the head
version. So these runs checked VALID and marked good runs in RUNLIST are
no longer yelling when openned with ROOT or having 0 charge problems:
        8515 8551 8564 8570 8576 8692 8949 8960 8963 9016 9051 9057 9257
        9315 9357 9360 9382 9704

The following runs are marked VALID in elog and good in RUNLIST, but they
are not included in your list, would like to see if there are any reasons
so I should exclude them from my list:
        8776 8794 8812 9030 9060 9061 9281 9342 9394 9501-9503 9506-9508
        9511-9512 9514-9515 9528

thanks again for the list.

Chi



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:31 EST