Re: [BLAST_ANAWARE] comments on some changes to DGen

From: vitaliy ziskin (vziskin@lns.mit.edu)
Date: Mon Sep 13 2004 - 14:05:14 EDT


Sounds good to me. There will be more changes to DGen coming after
Aaron finishes with blastmc side of it. I will run them by you once I'm
done.

                                                                         
   Cheers, Vitaliy

Chi Zhang wrote:

>Hi Vitaliy,
>
>I saw your changes on DGen_white. however I have to argue against them.
>
>I understand that the changes are the results of some discussions about
>reusing the same event for each every spin state. I have no issue against
>that.
>
>But I would really like you to keep the change in a non-intrusive way
>because I still want to run the old white Monte Carlo from time to time
>and I don't really want to bear the burden passed down from your channel.
>In fact the code would not work for "unpol" because of the explicity test of
>(s_state==1)
>
>So I hvae created a new class for your way specifically called
>DGen_White2, you way of generation is moved to mode 4 while 2 is retained
>for the original meaning.
>
>Chi
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:31 EST