Re: [BLAST_SHIFTS] Shift summary 11/11/2004 C (17-1)

From: Chris Crawford (chris2@lns.mit.edu)
Date: Fri Nov 12 2004 - 11:33:38 EST


  integrated over the last 2 weeks, they are at least 90% efficient,
probably 95%. although i'm not very sensitive to the forward tofs yet.
are the light guides still tied to some rope so they do not fall down
and break something?
--chris

Taylan Akdogan wrote:

>On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Adrian T Sindile wrote:
>
>
>
>>Hi!
>>Taylan called me and I pointed him to the TOF repair web page.
>>He graciuosly offered to mount the PMT on LT5 following the web
>>instructions, as neither Pete nor I could be at Bates during the day
>>today...
>>
>>To try and fix the RTT3, which Michael reported as having the lightguide
>>at a different angle, the whole group of 4 TOFs needs to be taken out with
>>a crane, RTT3 needs to be separated and then glued, cured overnight and
>>put back the next day. As it is now, it still gets data (but it should be
>>fixed ASAP).
>>If the two techs whom we trained for this (Chris and Dave?) are not around
>>anymore, Pete and I can come and fix it whenever there is plan on opening
>>the hall for half a day (Monday, Tuesday? Just let us know)... and then
>>come and put them back the next day. Data taking will probably have to
>>stop for those two days (4 TOFs missing)...
>>
>>
>
>
>How inefficient are they? Unless they are completely inefficient,
>which seems not to be the case, we should wait the weekly
>maintenance day for this.
>
>Taylan
>
>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:32 EST