Hi Michael,
Here are my results after using Chi's spin angle of 48.84 deg and taking
into account the bin-by-bin spin angle variation (sorry for the delay in
doing this):
http://einstein.unh.edu/~adrian/binByBinSpinAngle/
The first (text) file shows the bin-by-bin deviations from the nominal
spin angle obtained by using Doug's macro, as well as the dilutions I get
after fitting Hoehler to the asymmetries. Note the good agreement between
left and right sectors (I had a difference of 1% in dilution before doing
this bin-by-bin adjustment, that is gone now).
The text file also has my latest numbers (based on v3_4_18) for Ge/Gm and
the statistical errors:
http://einstein.unh.edu/~adrian/binByBinSpinAngle/binByBinSpinAngle.txt
The next two files show Ge/Gm:
http://einstein.unh.edu/~adrian/binByBinSpinAngle/geGmBinByBinSpinAngle.gif
http://einstein.unh.edu/~adrian/binByBinSpinAngle/geGmBinByBinSpinAngleZoom.gif
The last one is zoomed in in order to compare with the version I had
before the bin-by-bin spin angle adjustment:
http://einstein.unh.edu/~adrian/spinAngle/geGm_V3_4_18.gif
As Chris said in a previous email, very little difference between the two.
I still need to do an electron-proton Q^2 comparison in order to have
new numbers for the systematic errors - will do that next.
Adrian
PS: I wanted to call for tomorrow's meeting but I need to be in Boston for
a "research retreat" = "collaboration meeting" between noon and 5 PM...
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Adrian Sindile Room 205A, DeMeritt Hall
Research Scientist phone: (603)862-1217
Xenon Imaging Center & FAX: (603)862-2998
Nuclear Physics Group email: asindile@unh.edu
University of New Hampshire http://einstein.unh.edu/~adrian/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:33 EST
