CC:
	_ used DGEN/epel -  4 states - some segfaults in mc recon
	_ 15 MeV resolution (before t2d(angle) bug fix)
		_ Then switches track angle correction ON
		_ Montecarlo res improves to 6 MeV 
			_ But angle correction makes real data much worse !!
			_ bugs ??
		_ This is for 200 um) but only 50 % from ELOSS, MULS 
			_ TLee: is this result phi dependent ?


	_ Shows MC/inbend data comparison
	_ Show asymmetry from MC compared to point calculation
		_ mc averaging almost irrelevant !!
		_ Likely has to do with fact that for ep acceptance determined
		  only by e- and for each e- we always get proton
	_ Next Ge/Gm fro MC
		_ slope with Q2 seems different that expect
			_ Here there is an effect of acceptance !!
			_ Maybe in collapsing to a point Ge/Gm = f(Asym, tau)
			_ or bin by bin theta* correction
			_ effect 2-3 % around point calculation of Ge/Gm


	_ Shows methods to get Ge/Gm
		_ SuperR method: get polarization at each point
				and then build ratios
		_ Global fit: one parameter for L,R polarization, determine
				ratio directly from raw asymmetry
			can also add one parameter for spin angle in lab
		_ Turns out spin angle 35+-10
		_ Uses 45 deg fixed instead

	_ Show outbend Dec data	
		_ FF ratio data have 5-10% error bars, close to theory
		_ question: should global fit be constrained by ratio at Q2=0 ?
			_ needs to combine BLAST polarized data with pseudo-data
		_ no bckg subtraction

	_ shows also inbend data 2004
		_ some problems, particulary for Q2 > 0.4 
			_ (but 2004 data have poorer reconstruction, S/N)
				may have event selection problems
			_ average hPz now 0.21 was 0.28 in december

	_ combines data sets inbend/outbend
		_ comparison to point calculation
		_ no consideration of z-dependent polarization
			_ this correlates to Q2

	_ Looks at false asymmetries : 4 states, 2 choices
		_ typically 0.001 - 0.002 compared to 0.10-0.15 physics asymmetry


###################################


	MC-resolution studies as function of instrinsic wire resolution

		T2D    | 10 um | 200 um | 500 um | 2000 um

	     linear	 1.8 	 3.0	  6.7 	   94         MeV
	linear+physics   3.5     4.7 			      MeV
	6th order	 6.6				      MeV
	6th ord+physics   -       -       12.8		      MeV

	6th order of course depends also on fit to invert t2d
	after latest bug fixes

	Compares to X2 in data inbending
		_ X2 for protons consistent with 6th-order+physics & 500 um
		_ X2 for electrons worse
			_ not due to momentum but angle and crossing cells


###################################


	Advertises new wch ntuple
		new stub ordering to account for multi cell crossings
		allows us to study resolution vs stub type

	Advertises upgraded nsed !
		couples to graphical cuts on data ntuples
		right-click and select "view events"

		right click on wires in nsed gives wire key