Re: [BLAST_SHIFTS] summary,plan 10-31

From: Adrian T Sindile (asindile@cisunix.unh.edu)
Date: Thu Oct 31 2002 - 13:06:53 EST


Hi, Tancredi!
I have a question (I will be on shift this evening, anyway, but just for
my education)...
I remember at the end of July there was a discussion that since we were
not getting many electrons at backward angles, we would have really liked
to have better working Cerenkovs - otherwise we would retime with protons
in that region; since protons are slower (and really not reliable for
timing), that would create problems.
Did we get around this problem this time? I was not on any retiming shift,
just want to make sure I understand...
Thanks!

Adrian

-------------------------------
Adrian Sindile
Research Assistant
Nuclear Physics Group
University of New Hampshire
phone: (603)862-1691
FAX: (603)862-2998
email: asindile@alberti.unh.edu
http://einstein.unh.edu/~adrian/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:28 EST