Re: [BLAST_ANAWARE] minutes analysis meeting

From: Tancredi Botto (tancredi@mitlns.mit.edu)
Date: Fri Apr 18 2003 - 11:22:19 EDT


> > In final v2 candidate tracks will be fit only in the Wch (no
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> prototype implemented and
> check into CVS. Need debug, test and optimization. The (no swimming)
> comment is not true. The swim is basicaly our function to be minimized. No
> fit can be done without swim. We can only reduce the number of swim,
> but never NO SWIM. :)

You are absolutely right, put like this it makes little sense. What I
meant to say (correct me if I am wrong again) is that you do not need to
swim all candidate tracks to eliminate those that are built from inconsistent
(combinatorial?) segments.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:29 EST