we'll fix lrn.C up.
--chris
vitaliy ziskin wrote:
> Chris,
> This is all great, but we all use lrn.C to analyzed data. And by
> definition if lrn.C does not work with newer verstions of BlastLib
> (i.e greater than 2.18) it is useless to most of us. And my
> experience is that lrn.C does not work with new versions. Can you
> please make sure that lrn.C works with the version that you are
> working on. Of course the best would be if most of what lrn.C has to
> offer is part of the standart v3 release.
>
>
> Cheers, Vitaliy
>
> Chris Crawford wrote:
>
>> hi tong,
>> i'm almost done v3. there is something checked in there, but it
>> still uses v2 geometry principally. you might have to use the -A flag.
>> i'm also tagging v2_20 soon, which will have wang's fast fitter.
>> --chris
>>
>> Frederick Tong-Uk Lee wrote:
>>
>>> Chris,
>>>
>>> This sounds good.
>>> Hope we get the resolution what we need.
>>>
>>> Hey, by the way, are you doing something with v3?
>>> We are trying to cvs out Aaron's v3 MC and
>>> getting empty directories. Do I need to use v2_19
>>> for v3 or something?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -T
>>>
>>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:29 EST