Waited for beam. Worked on analysis: identifying QE events is rather
straightforward by looking at Mm vs pm. changed the definitions of pm in
strings.C to account for sqrt of < numbers (resolution effect). A
selection for pm <100 MeV seems already good. No convincing sign of
asymmetry though.
Our eep data seem to reproduce the xsection shape but I haven't
played with it too much (change variables) or thought about
normalizations. Worked on the definition of asymmetries and false
asymmetries for eep, see show_deep_tb_asym.C. Play with cuts, you can
always at least compare hl[30], hr[30] with montecarlo in pm, Mm
Montecarlo files are in pro2003/analysis and there is a log file as well
(courtesy of CZ, thanks for the nice calc)
Leave plots (and the name of the cuts used) in the logbook as usual (?)
btw: Just noticed completely by chance that at some point lower sx chamber
abs pressure took a jump from 9 to 7e-7, similar to a step function.
-- ________________________________________________________________________________ Tancredi Botto, phone: +1-617-253-9204 mobile: +1-978-490-4124 research scientist MIT/Bates, 21 Manning Av Middleton MA, 01949 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:29 EST