Can at least the 'bottom line' along with a plot of the data be added
to the logbook so everybody is informed instead of confused?
Hauke
On Tuesday, September 30, 2003, at 09:35 AM, Tancredi Botto wrote:
>
>
> Bottom line is that for nominal gas runs taken *after* the collimator
> was
> installed we have the same normalized yield as for empty target runs,
> although the pressure in the scattering chamber increased.
>
>
>
>> rumor spread through email about no gas in target when operating
>> gas feed system.
>> calls to counting bay from Manoucher and Ernie etc.
>> decision was made to warm cell and open up in the morning.
>> no info about the background of this rumor was found!
>> no note in logbook, no data or plots in counting bay and no
>> information
>> passed on to shift crew.
>
>
>> when operating gas feed system found pressure increase in TC ok,
>> leaves internal problem, if any.
>>
>> warmed up target cell so that we can open chmaber in the morning.
>> several vacuum bumps into the 1e-6 range during warmup.
>> temp at 250 by 00:30h.
>>
>> continued bump study.
>> 2 hours of tuning the beam.
>> horizontal 0mm, vertical +1mm.
>> started taking data on this at 00:15h.
>>
>>
>>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:30 EST