Hi, Chi!
I checked out (from scratch) from CVS as specified in the previous email.
I should now have everything like the blast account, right?
How did you get e-p events?
If I run nsed (not my own cruncher) again and look for the results you
mentioned:
> I ran nsed on 3691 and I have the following ep events by the program:
> 145, 229, 348, 610, 676, 1037, 1091, 1337, 1553, 1599. 10 of them, not
> very shabby compare to 7 with old version. In fact the new version is
> constantly getting a 40-50% more tracks than 2_96. I believe with the
> proposed new calibration, we will get even more tracks.
> these events are all recongnized by the program as havine on electron in
> one sector and a proton in the other sector. some electrons are
> misidentified as pi-.
... this is what I get for first two events (145 and 229):
Event Number: 145
nw 0 pion- : Sec 1 SC10 CC-1 NC-1 q-1 : M=0.96324 X2M=34.82648
p=0.51019
L=379.72 T=27.06 V=14.04 SC_Y=89.70 X2SC=62.94
nw 1 pion+ : Sec 0 SC 6 CC 1 NC-1 q 1 : M=0.13957 X2M=0.00000
p=0.55892 trig
L=428.17 T=14.71 V=29.11 SC_Y=-23.90 X2SC=43.72
nw 2 pion+ : Sec 0 SC 6 CC 1 NC-1 q 1 : M=0.00033 X2M=0.99525
p=0.55512 trig
L=458.81 T=14.71 V=30.00 SC_Y=-23.90 X2SC=44.48
nw 3 pion+ : Sec 0 SC 6 CC 1 NC-1 q 1 : M=0.00033 X2M=0.99525
p=0.55543 trig
L=487.06 T=14.71 V=30.00 SC_Y=-23.90 X2SC=45.36
nw 4 positive : Sec 0 SC-1 CC 1 NC-1 q 1 : M=0.00000 X2M=nan p=0.54389
L=0.00 T=-25.89 V=nan SC_Y=0.00 X2SC=-1.00
nw 5 electron : Sec 0 SC 6 CC 1 NC-1 q-1 : M=0.10311 X2M=40314.84870
p=0.32292 trig
L=420.11 T=14.71 V=28.58 SC_Y=-23.90 X2SC=40.74
nw 6 negative : Sec 0 SC-1 CC 1 NC-1 q-1 : M=0.00000 X2M=nan p=0.15937
L=0.00 T=-25.89 V=nan SC_Y=0.00 X2SC=-1.00
nw 7 negative : Sec 0 SC-1 CC 1 NC-1 q-1 : M=0.00000 X2M=nan p=0.16260
L=0.00 T=-25.89 V=nan SC_Y=0.00 X2SC=-1.00
Event Number: 229
nw 0 pion- : Sec 0 SC13 CC-1 NC-1 q-1 : M=0.85115 X2M=25.99257
p=0.23130
L=292.39 T=37.19 V=7.87 SC_Y=14.20 X2SC=8.98
nw 1 pion+ : Sec 1 SC 2 CC 0 NC-1 q 1 : M=0.13957 X2M=0.00000
p=0.74307 trig
L=451.59 T=15.32 V=29.48 SC_Y=22.50 X2SC=1.48
They do not look like e-p events here... I agree they look nice on the
nsed display, but how can I know they are e-p if nsed misidentifies them?
How can I reproduce your nsed's results (or how do you know they were
e-p)?
Thanks for looking into this!
Adrian
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:30 EST