Re: [BLAST_ANAWARE] About pro2004

From: Tancredi Botto (tancredi@lns.mit.edu)
Date: Fri Jan 16 2004 - 18:14:07 EST


> Yes, this would be very helpful. However, I propose a name that
> is more informative rather than just "PRO". What about
> "BLAST_SESSION"?

The voting polls are open... Then how about BLAST_RUN ?

The name "pro" is transparent (at least to me) as usually systems
had two copies of cernlibs in /cern/pro and /cern/new, where pro (which
stands for "production") was the absolutely safe fall back.

-tancredi

P.S.
I realize I have managed to live long enough not to remember of any
cerlib update for a quite a stretch now...
 

> Taylan
>
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Tancredi Botto wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> > coda session name and file name will change. Everything will be pro2004
> >
> > One comment: actually we should take this chance to stop hardcoding
> > pro2003 anymore. The et_transfer, the root search path, init getters (and
> > maybe a few other things) should set via the environment variable $PRO
> >
> > In this way (depending on your shell) we need only toggle one of these
> > possible choices
> >
> > setenv PRO pro2003
> > setenv PRO pro2004
> > setenv PRO commis
> >
> > in the login file. For the blast account I plan to make $DATADIR/$ANALDIR
> > dependent on the PRO variable.
> >
> > Users should make these changes in their environment as well (minimally,
> > you should only have to set "PRO" in you login, and do that after CVS is
> > updated and redownloaded in your account)
> >
> >
> >
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:30 EST