Re: [BLAST_ANAWARE] About pro2004

From: Adrian T Sindile (asindile@cisunix.unh.edu)
Date: Fri Jan 16 2004 - 18:19:07 EST


Hi, Taylan, Tancredi!

> The voting polls are open... Then how about BLAST_RUN ?

If we care to be consistent with the RUN table in the MySQL database, I
would suggest BatchName (this name was suggested some time ago at an
analysis meeting - see MySQL, RUN table).
A run is fully described by BatchName (commis, pro*, etc.) and RunNumber...

Adrian

>
> The name "pro" is transparent (at least to me) as usually systems
> had two copies of cernlibs in /cern/pro and /cern/new, where pro (which
> stands for "production") was the absolutely safe fall back.
>
> -tancredi
>
>
> P.S.
> I realize I have managed to live long enough not to remember of any
> cerlib update for a quite a stretch now...
>
>
>
> > Taylan
> >
> > On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Tancredi Botto wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > coda session name and file name will change. Everything will be pro2004
> > >
> > > One comment: actually we should take this chance to stop hardcoding
> > > pro2003 anymore. The et_transfer, the root search path, init getters (and
> > > maybe a few other things) should set via the environment variable $PRO
> > >
> > > In this way (depending on your shell) we need only toggle one of these
> > > possible choices
> > >
> > > setenv PRO pro2003
> > > setenv PRO pro2004
> > > setenv PRO commis
> > >
> > > in the login file. For the blast account I plan to make $DATADIR/$ANALDIR
> > > dependent on the PRO variable.
> > >
> > > Users should make these changes in their environment as well (minimally,
> > > you should only have to set "PRO" in you login, and do that after CVS is
> > > updated and redownloaded in your account)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:30 EST