Hi Adrian,
Thanks for your message. I am looking forward to your presentation. My
point is that you should do a sanity check on the error bars using the
known `dilution factor' and total number of ep events and compare with the
proposal. The bottom line is to check that your results make sense. This
is important for extrapolating to future running.
Thanks,
Richard
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, Adrian T Sindile wrote:
> Hi, Richard!
> I do not trust the error calculation at this point (I wrote that code
> while on shift on Monday) - and GE/GM drops off much faster than
> expected... then goes back up.
> I was excited about actually getting to the point of extracting GE/GM, not
> because I was confident in the result...
>
> I know I get the super-ratio versus Q2 correctly (and I trust the error
> calculation for that). I am looking into this and hope to be able to say
> more on Thursday...
>
> Adrian
>
> -------------------------------
> Adrian Sindile
> Research Assistant
> Nuclear Physics Group
> University of New Hampshire
> phone: (603)862-1691
> FAX: (603)862-2998
> email: asindile@alberti.unh.edu
> http://einstein.unh.edu/~adrian/
>
>
--
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:30 EST