Chi,
What about comparison to NIKHEF t20 point which from what I understand
was an aboslute measurement,due to a tensor polarimeter?
Vitaliy
Chi Zhang wrote:
>Hi Michael,
>
>I don't have any update on Pz-Pzz since there has been no new developement that
>calls for an update on Pzz from ed-elastic. All results from last "big meeting"
>still hold. only that now I have a better agreement for cross section. I
>reported that to Tancredi already last week.
>
>I don't have any update on WC resolution either.
>
>I may not be able to attend the meeting on Wednesday. Apologize before hand.
>
>Chi
>
>ÒýÓÃ Michael Kohl <kohlm@MIT.EDU>:
>
>
>
>>On behalf of Tancredi I am setting up an agenda for the coming Blast
>>Analysis Meeting on Wednesday 05/05/04.
>>
>>Would you guys be willing to present your contributions for an update
>>on the Pz-Pzz discussion?
>>
>>-What are the actual numbers on Pz, Pzz?
>>-What are the error estimates?
>>-What are the recent changes, and how big were the effects?
>>
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>> Michael
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>
>>+-------------------------------------+--------------------------+
>>| Office: | Home: |
>>|-------------------------------------|--------------------------|
>>| Dr. Michael Kohl | Michael Kohl |
>>| Laboratory for Nuclear Science | 5 Ibbetson Street |
>>| MIT-Bates Linear Accelerator Center | Somerville, MA 02143 |
>>| Middleton, MA 01949 | U.S.A. |
>>| U.S.A. | |
>>| - - - - - - - - - - - - | - - - - - - - - -|
>>| Email: kohlm@mit.edu | K.Michael.Kohl@gmx.de |
>>| Work: +1-617-253-9207 | Home: +1-617-629-3147 |
>>| Fax: +1-617-253-9599 | Mobile: +1-978-580-4190 |
>>| http://blast.lns.mit.edu | |
>>+-------------------------------------+--------------------------+
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:31 EST