Eugene, I also get very bad results for this run years. You can see
numberic summary results in users/tancredi/results/Res for various run
numbers. Since the electron seems fine, I wonder if it is a feature of our
configuration rather than a new bug in the codes
I've also attached
diff ~/pro2004/Blast_Params/blastrc
/home/blast/blast/cvs_v2/Blast_Params/blastrc
It may be worthwhile to run with the
a) same blastrc of last year (where possible)
b) same code of last year (see ~/lib/libBlast.so.2.96b)
Do we see a difference between these two data sets in the (various) cell
plots discussed wednsday ?
-- ________________________________________________________________________________ Tancredi Botto, phone: +1-617-253-9204 mobile: +1-978-490-4124 research scientist MIT/Bates, 21 Manning Av Middleton MA, 01949 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:31 EST