Hi, Chris!
Thanks - I know about that version, just wondering if you guys already
updated it. I will grab that one then.
Thanks again.
Adrian
>
> adrian,
> see chi's note about the most recent branch he added. it is basically
> the head except for TBLFitTrack.{cc,h}, which has a segfault i haven't
> had time to fix. note that need the latest version of FitTrack for the
> recrunches, since it fixes the integrated path length.
> --chris
>
> (blast_talk, 2004/5/30)
> Hi,
>
> I narrowed down the problem to TBLFitTrack.h/cc. So I create another tag
> called memorialday2. update to this tag would give you a copy of library
> that works and is closest to the current version. all files in this tag
> are same as the head except TBLFitTrack.h and .cc
>
> If you want to do developement on sources other than these two, you can
> update to head and revert these two files back to the tag by:
> cvs up -rmemorialday2 TBLFitTrack.*
>
> Chi
>
>
>
> Wang Xu wrote:
>
> >Hi Adrian,
> > Since almost every one submit some codes into the head version
> >without fully debuging the codes, (In fact, it is very difficult to debug)
> >It often cause some mistakes, even segmentation faults. Because we will do
> >a big recrunch for all recent runs, therefore I suggest we should make a
> >branch and carefully check the codes, then start to do recrunch.
> > Wang
> >
> >
> >On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, Wang Xu wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Hi Adrian,
> >> I did not setup time information. Other than that, everything are
> >>inculded in Bats software.
> >> Codes currently are in cvs_v3bats/ directary.
> >> Wang
> >>
> >>On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Adrian T Sindile wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Hi, Wang!
> >>>Here is the TOF info I am currently using in my analysis:
> >>>
> >>>gRecon->fTracks(itrk)->fDet->TOF_PAD(),
> >>>gRecon->fTracks(itrk)->fDet->PathLength(),
> >>>gRecon->fTracks(itrk)->fDet->TOF_rtime(),
> >>>gRecon->fTracks(itrk)->fDet->TOF_time(),
> >>>gRecon->fTracks(itrk)->fDet->TOF_E(),
> >>>gRecon->fTracks(itrk)->fDet->TOF_Chi2(),
> >>>gRecon->fTracks(itrk)->fDet->TOF_Y(),
> >>>
> >>>Do we have these for the BATs (except, of course, the Chi2 of the track,
> >>>since the BATs are outside the WC acceptance)? What else will we have
> >>>there?
> >>>
> >>>Also, since we will be recrunching from the head version of BlastLib2, why
> >>>don't you merge your stuff into the head version (unless somebody sees a
> >>>problem with this - please speak up guys, if so)?
> >>>
> >>>Thanks!
> >>>
> >>>Adrian
> >>>
> >>>-------------------------------
> >>>Adrian Sindile
> >>>Research Assistant
> >>>Nuclear Physics Group
> >>>University of New Hampshire
> >>>phone: (603)862-1691
> >>>FAX: (603)862-2998
> >>>email: asindile@alberti.unh.edu
> >>>http://einstein.unh.edu/~adrian/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:31 EST