I believe there is a need to either disconnect it or replace it since
statistics are rather limited on e'n events and (TOF plus CC in trig==2) is
yielding a high number of events that shouldn't be in the trigger. The tube is
bad, meaning very very noisy. In contrast to the signal on the scope from the
other tubes, that PMT was not registering anything coherent, there was no
trigger signal. And that tube was registering a hit in 3.2% of good ep events
with electron Right, while R0 was registering a hit in 0.28% of electron Left
ep events. The noise is completely random and happening a factor of ten times
more than random signals in any other box. I know from neutron analysis that
the CC cut is highly efficient in removing unwanted junk, and it could be more
efficient. I think it is worth it.
eugene
Quoting Karen Dow <kdow@mit.edu>:
>
> I think this tube is bad in the sense that it is noisy, not in
> the
> sense that it isn't working at all. So it's causing LCer0 to put a lot
> of
> spurious hits into the trigger system, rather than reducing the number
> of
> hits. LCer0 counts at 7-10 times the rate of the other left Cerenkovs
> in
> the scalers.
>
> Even though LCer0 is noisy, it doesn't appear to be giving us a
>
> lot of extra singles events, or a lot of extra "2 TOF in one sector"
> events, the only event types that require a Cerenkov. Looking with
> nsed,
> less than 10% of those types of events come from an accidental between
>
> LCer0 and a TOF that's not LT0-3. Presumably the second level trigger
>
> cleans things up.
>
> It's not clear to me that we NEED to change out the tube.
> There
> is probably manpower available, and access to the pit. And I believe we
>
> have spares. Chris Vidal will have to show a technician how to do it,
> as
> the two guys who have done it recently have both been laid off. But if
> the
> tube is working, just noisy, do we want to replace it (and have to
> gain-match it, possibly have a different problem that DOES affect the
> data)?
>
> Karen
>
> At 10:46 AM 6/11/2004 -0700, Eugene J. Geis wrote:
>
> >The bad tube in CC_L0 is the top center PMT tube... Do we have spare
>
> >PMT's and
> >do we think it's possible to have it replaced over our shutdown? I
> would
> >volunteer to do the work but I'll be in Maine for the next two weeks.
> >eugene
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eugene Geis
PhD Student, Physics Department, ASU
Research Affiliate, MIT-Bates Laboratory of Nuclear Science
eugene.geis@asu.edu
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------water is good------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
** Check Out the Phatty Acidz @ http://www.phattyacidz.com **
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:31 EST