I know it's not you. I never said that it was you. This is probably
some badness with L15s. I remember we had troubles with them during the
experiment. I agree a more detailed look is needed. This was a quick
gaze just to get a good sence of a luminocity, which I think is in the
ball park.
Vitaliy
Tancredi Botto wrote:
>Vitaly,
>it must be you, or your cuts, or at least it's not me..
>
>See attach Q2 spectrum with one cut only "qwl==-1". By chance the scales
>is the same (x100..). My plot does not fall off as fast as yours.
>Situation does not changes with ep QE cut (pm_eep_cut)
>
>Actaully, also chi's data match reasoanble well in that Q2 area.
>
>Are you sure you don't have e- momentum cuts or else ?
>how do you filter data ?
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:31 EST