Re: [BLAST_ANAWARE] started recrunch

From: Michael Kohl (kohlm@mit.edu)
Date: Wed Sep 22 2004 - 10:25:54 EDT


Hi Tancredi and all,

> why dst again ? You should have enough time for lrn ?

..because this is what we said last Wednesday in the meeting. According to
Chi, the dst recrunch would already show the improved wire chamber
resolution, and does the job for the neutron timing. The only gain to run
lrn would then be the issue of finding additional tracks, which has not
been changed for a while.

We can discuss on Friday if we want lrn recrunch before the conferences,
however I am convinced that we can be happy with lrd.

Regards,

  Michael

 --

+-------------------------------------+--------------------------+
| Office: | Home: |
|-------------------------------------|--------------------------|
| Dr. Michael Kohl | Michael Kohl |
| Laboratory for Nuclear Science | 5 Ibbetson Street |
| MIT-Bates Linear Accelerator Center | Somerville, MA 02143 |
| Middleton, MA 01949 | U.S.A. |
| U.S.A. | |
| - - - - - - - - - - - - | - - - - - - - - -|
| Email: kohlm@mit.edu | K.Michael.Kohl@gmx.de |
| Work: +1-617-253-9207 | Home: +1-617-629-3147 |
| Fax: +1-617-253-9599 | Mobile: +1-978-580-4190 |
| http://blast.lns.mit.edu | |
+-------------------------------------+--------------------------+

 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:31 EST