if we did do lrn, i want my H2 crunched first, since it is such a
smaller dataset!
--chris
Michael Kohl wrote:
>Hi Tancredi and all,
>
>
>
>>why dst again ? You should have enough time for lrn ?
>>
>>
>
>..because this is what we said last Wednesday in the meeting. According to
>Chi, the dst recrunch would already show the improved wire chamber
>resolution, and does the job for the neutron timing. The only gain to run
>lrn would then be the issue of finding additional tracks, which has not
>been changed for a while.
>
>We can discuss on Friday if we want lrn recrunch before the conferences,
>however I am convinced that we can be happy with lrd.
>
>Regards,
>
> Michael
>
>
>
> --
>
>+-------------------------------------+--------------------------+
>| Office: | Home: |
>|-------------------------------------|--------------------------|
>| Dr. Michael Kohl | Michael Kohl |
>| Laboratory for Nuclear Science | 5 Ibbetson Street |
>| MIT-Bates Linear Accelerator Center | Somerville, MA 02143 |
>| Middleton, MA 01949 | U.S.A. |
>| U.S.A. | |
>| - - - - - - - - - - - - | - - - - - - - - -|
>| Email: kohlm@mit.edu | K.Michael.Kohl@gmx.de |
>| Work: +1-617-253-9207 | Home: +1-617-629-3147 |
>| Fax: +1-617-253-9599 | Mobile: +1-978-580-4190 |
>| http://blast.lns.mit.edu | |
>+-------------------------------------+--------------------------+
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:31 EST