Re: [BLASTTALK] T10 plot

From: John Calarco (jrc@einstein.unh.edu)
Date: Fri Oct 22 2004 - 07:57:54 EDT


Pete,

   1.) on the plot, the T10 axis should be labeled T^e_10.

   2.) regarding the sogn convention, the sign for T10 affects the value
       of T11. How big is the effect?

                                                      John

On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Peter Karpius wrote:

> Hi folks-
>
> After suggestions yesterday to extract T10 I have done this and it
> is shown in the attached plot. This question of the sign of T10 rears its
> ugly head again however and now I am thinking that it is positive as this
> is what the data are telling me. The
> problem is that it all comes down to a convention and symmetry properties
> relating analyziing powers and polarization tensors. The 2nd Q2
> point is consistent with zero but the first is not. Anyway, please take
> a look at the attached plots and let me know what you think. Note that I
> am now using P_z = 0.46 as opposed to 0.5. In the mean time I will
> address the other fixes to my talk.
>
> Pete
>
> ----------------------------------------------
> Pete Karpius
> Graduate Research Assistant
> Nuclear Physics Group
> University of New Hampshire
> phone: (603)978-6152
> FAX: (603)862-2998
> email: karpiusp@einstein.unh.edu
> http://pubpages.unh.edu/~pkarpius/homepage.htm
> ----------------------------------------------
>

-- 
John R. Calarco
Dept. of Physics
Univ. of New Hampshire
Durham, NH 03824
phone: (603)862-2088
FAX:   (603)862-2998
email: calarco@unh.edu



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:31 EST