On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Nikolas Meitanis wrote:
> For those who are "investing" time in analysis:
> I have looked at yields for (e,e') and have found some runs that show a
> discrepancy with their surrounding runs:
>
> 16092-16096: this seems to be one of those "nozzle-freeze" sequences.
> The rate for 16093 is obscenely low but it recovers
> somewhat for the next three. I am not sure why.
>
> Low yields: 16204, 16250, 15374, 15417
> High yields: 15172, 15361
16093 seems to be a short run with only about 10C on each states, I don't
see too low elastic rates on the other 4 runs but ed statistics is not
good on run by run bases so the fluctuation is big. I vote for excluding
these runs anyway.
in reply to the more recent message from Nick,
I now see 15050 and it looks good. I don't know what happened, but I vote
for including 15050 now.
my list of high BQM runs overlap with well but I
bqmt 14473 14529 15515 15641 15711 16148 16164
bqml 14488 14556 14570 14729 14968 15626 16022
bqmb 14528 14530 14691 14946 15606 15833 15898
bqmr 14554 14781 14825 15080 15182 15742 16095
scalr 14500 14614 14711 15091 15518 15874 16004
extras from Nick: 14878 14909 14978 15678 15747
again, for whats-worth-it. :)
Chi
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:32 EST