Re: [BLAST_ANAWARE] 2005 RUNLIST question

From: Chi Zhang (zhangchi@MIT.EDU)
Date: Sun Jun 26 2005 - 14:30:20 EDT


addition: 15189 15191-15195 (Apr 13)
          15789-15795 15797 (May 06) (taget SpinBits not flipping)
          16097-16101 16103-16105 (May 18)
          16205-16211 16213-16220 16222-16224 (May 22)

you can't build asymmetry from the May 06 data but computing rates should
be OK.

On Sun, 26 Jun 2005, Nikolas Meitanis wrote:

> While we are at it, the following are the empty target runs I am
> currently using for 2005 data.
> Any objections and/or additions are welcome:
>
> 14590-14593 14595-14601 14535-14539 14541-14545 14640-14644
> 14646-14649 14748-14753 14923-14924 14926-14931 15375-15381 15560-15567
> 15569-15574 15576-15582 15584-15591 15593-15594 15753 15755-15757
> 15759-15760
>
> This is around 36kC.
> n
>
>
> Chi Zhang wrote:
>
> >
> >On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Nikolas Meitanis wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>For those who are "investing" time in analysis:
> >>I have looked at yields for (e,e') and have found some runs that show a
> >>discrepancy with their surrounding runs:
> >>
> >>16092-16096: this seems to be one of those "nozzle-freeze" sequences.
> >>The rate for 16093 is obscenely low but it recovers
> >> somewhat for the next three. I am not sure why.
> >>
> >>Low yields: 16204, 16250, 15374, 15417
> >>High yields: 15172, 15361
> >>
> >>
> >
> >16093 seems to be a short run with only about 10C on each states, I don't
> >see too low elastic rates on the other 4 runs but ed statistics is not
> >good on run by run bases so the fluctuation is big. I vote for excluding
> >these runs anyway.
> >
> >in reply to the more recent message from Nick,
> >
> >I now see 15050 and it looks good. I don't know what happened, but I vote
> >for including 15050 now.
> >
> >my list of high BQM runs overlap with well but I
> >
> > bqmt 14473 14529 15515 15641 15711 16148 16164
> > bqml 14488 14556 14570 14729 14968 15626 16022
> > bqmb 14528 14530 14691 14946 15606 15833 15898
> > bqmr 14554 14781 14825 15080 15182 15742 16095
> >scalr 14500 14614 14711 15091 15518 15874 16004
> >
> >extras from Nick: 14878 14909 14978 15678 15747
> >
> >again, for whats-worth-it. :)
> >
> >Chi
> >
> >
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:32 EST