Hi, Tancredi, guys!
I was not able to reproduce the scaler charge result from charge-3697.chg
using my code (I am able to reproduce other runs, like the short 3700)...
So I tried to get the result using charge.C:
in /net/data/4/Analysis/pro2003, I typed:
% root -l charge.C 3697
The file I created this way is ADRIANcharge-3697.chg.
To my surprise, this file does not reproduce the result we have in
charge-3697.chg. In fact, it reproduces exactly the result I am getting
with my code:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Scaler charge (C) BEAM/TGT-VECTOR states BEAM/Unpol
(+/+ +/- -/+ -/-) (+/u -/u)
beamgated 0 0 11.4221 0 0 0
not gated 0 0 12.9684 0 0 0
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The charge-3697.chg file has:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Scaler charge (C) BEAM/TGT-VECTOR states BEAM/Unpol
(+/+ +/- -/+ -/-) (+/u -/u)
beamgated 1.25993 0 11.537 0 0 0
not gated 1.64705 0 13.1053 0 0 0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moreover, if one tries to use the electronics.map and Epics.map we
had at the time of run 3697 (info from the database) one gets error
messages (too ugly to paste here, complaints about the size of epics
array)!
Can anyone tell me if I do something wrong?
Can we reproduce the charge result for run 3697 and if so, how (details
on exactly what maps, macros, from what directory etc. welcome)?
The point is I might be doing something wrong, but if not, we might have
some wrong charge files (or no means to reproduce them if they are OK).
Thanks a lot!
Adrian
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:30 EST