Ha!
Just to add to the confusion: here's integration of my code(new version of
lrn)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Scaler charge (C) BEAM/TGT-VECTOR states BEAM/Unpol
(+/+ +/- -/+ -/-) (+/u -/u)
beamgated 0 0 11.4088 0 0 0
not gated 1.6469 0 13.0770 0 0 0
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
typically, the beamgated charge integrated by charge.C is a tiny little
bigger than it should be. This is due to the fact that between fills,
LDCCT reads 0 but the calibration used to translate LDCCT into mA does not
give 0mA for 0 LDCCT. for this run, compare charge on -/+, the error
caused by this is ~0.1C out of 11C.
I put a hack in the charge integrater in library that stops charge
integration if scaler rate is absolutely 0. so my gated charge is less
than charge.C.
about the charge on +/+ state, no idea, ofcourse everyone thinks himself
right. :) but mine seem to be a "averaged" version of the other two.
Chi
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Adrian T Sindile wrote:
> with my code:
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Scaler charge (C) BEAM/TGT-VECTOR states BEAM/Unpol
> (+/+ +/- -/+ -/-) (+/u -/u)
> beamgated 0 0 11.4221 0 0 0
> not gated 0 0 12.9684 0 0 0
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The charge-3697.chg file has:
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Scaler charge (C) BEAM/TGT-VECTOR states BEAM/Unpol
> (+/+ +/- -/+ -/-) (+/u -/u)
> beamgated 1.25993 0 11.537 0 0 0
> not gated 1.64705 0 13.1053 0 0 0
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:30 EST