Vitaliy,
Not sure I quite understand the numbers you quote in your email vs.
the numbers on the figures. In the first figure, in the top two panels,
I see dilution factors of 0.41-0.43 but in the text you quote 0.51-0.54.
How are these related?
John
On Mon, 3 May 2004, Vitaliy Ziskin wrote:
>
> Hello,
> After I corrected DGen and found out a target angle I reran the blastmc.
> Here are the results:
>
> Vector (Pe*Pz):
> Left : 0.54 \pm 0.02
> Right: 0.51 \pm 0.02
>
> Tensor (Pzz)
>
> Left: 0.54 \pm 0.09
> Right: 0.65 \pm 0.11
>
> I include two pictures. The first one is the asymmetry vs. Q^2. It is to
> show mainly that I get the same result whether I extract the polarization
> with Arenhovel's model or elastic form factor ration from Hoehler (top two
> plots). Also, notice that left and right sides finaly agree. Second
> picture is the vector asymmetry vs. missing momentum with Q^2 < 0.35, the
> gray band is the blastmc run for 300 hours. Though tensor quasielastic
> analysis needs to addressed some more, I'm almost convinced that we are
> doing the vector analysis right. Let me know what you think.
>
> Best regards, Vitaliy
>
> --
> =====================================================================
> Vitaliy Ziskin Tel: (617)253-9209
> MIT 26-547 http://www.lns.mit.edu/people/vziskin/
> 77 Massachusetts Ave
> Cambridge, Ma
> 02139
> ======================================================================
> "For long you live and high you fly
> And smiles you'll give and tears you'll cry
> And all you touch and all you see
> Is all your life will ever be"--Pink Floyd
>
>
>
-- John R. Calarco Dept. of Physics Univ. of New Hampshire Durham, NH 03824 phone: (603)862-2088 FAX: (603)862-2998 email: calarco@unh.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:31 EST