[BLAST_ANAWARE] crunching in the new library

From: Eugene J. Geis (Eugene.Geis@asu.edu)
Date: Fri Apr 01 2005 - 10:30:01 EST

Next message: Chi Zhang: "Re: [BLAST_ANAWARE] crunching in the new library"
Previous message: Peter Karpius: "Re: [BLAST_SHIFTS] Shift summary 04/01/2005 A (1-9)"
In reply to: Michael Kohl: "[BLAST_ANAWARE] analysis meeting on 3/30/5"
Next in thread: Chi Zhang: "Re: [BLAST_ANAWARE] crunching in the new library"
Reply: Chi Zhang: "Re: [BLAST_ANAWARE] crunching in the new library"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

In v3_4_4 or 6... whichever we're presently using, Wire Chambers have a listed entry for raw hits but it
seems that there is some kind of veto on number of hits between 0-10 and a veto on number of hits
above 80. Can someone please explain the algorithm undertaken when the WC hits are in the range
between 0 and 10? Are they simply assumed to be neutral particle events and hwl/hwr are written as 0?

eugene

Next message: Chi Zhang: "Re: [BLAST_ANAWARE] crunching in the new library"
Previous message: Peter Karpius: "Re: [BLAST_SHIFTS] Shift summary 04/01/2005 A (1-9)"
In reply to: Michael Kohl: "[BLAST_ANAWARE] analysis meeting on 3/30/5"
Next in thread: Chi Zhang: "Re: [BLAST_ANAWARE] crunching in the new library"
Reply: Chi Zhang: "Re: [BLAST_ANAWARE] crunching in the new library"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:32 EST