Hi,
I've just checked and found that flr files produced by lrd have never had
nwl,r and hwl,r filled in any version.
So, this seems not be a bug but a missing piece of software in lrd.
Regards,
Michael
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Yuan Xiao wrote:
> Hi Chris and Michael,
>
> Just a reminder, from v16 and including v16, nwl/r and hwl/r were all zeros.
>
> Yuan
>
>
> Quoting Christopher Crawford <chris2@lns.mit.edu>:
>
>> Hi Michael,
>> I'll take a look at them as soon as I can. You can do 'cvs diff - r
>> v3_4_17 -r v3_4_18', to see what has changed, but I can't think of
>> anything I would have don't to omit them.
>> You are right, I haven't looked at Lwl,r yet. I did introduce an
>> independent (albeit slow) track fitter TBLMinuitTrack as a check of
>> TBLNewt. The only thing left to check in reconstruction is TBLSimTrack,
>> the RK4 integrator itself. It has undergone various modifications, and
>> the fact that it doesn't calculate the track length properly leads me to
>> suspect the rest of the integration also! So I believe the proper way to
>> check the path length is to rewrite a new track integration, which
>> integrates along arc-lengths instead of straight lines (for higher
>> accuracy). When I get time!
>> --Chris
>> _______________________________________
>>
>> TA-53/MPF-1/D111 P-23 MS H803
>> LANL, Los Alamos, NM 87545
>> 505-665-9804(o) 665-4121(f) 662-0639(h)
>> _______________________________________
>>
>>
>> On Apr 10, 2006, at 09:03:04, Michael Kohl wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Chris,
>>>
>>> can you find out the reason for the missing entries? I think it only
>>> occurred after you checked in your new variables.
>>>
>>> On pathlength: In v3_4_18 there are still double peaks in Lwl,r. Am I
>>> right that this method hasn't been touched and that the only fix compared
>>> to v3_4_17 was regarding ltwl,r?
>>> Is ltwl,r correct? Are we going to live with ltwl,r for the time being?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Michael
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2006 17:59:29 -0700 (MST)
>>> From: Eugene J. Geis <Eugene.Geis@asu.edu>
>>> To: Michael Kohl <kohlm@mit.edu>
>>> Cc: Yuan Xiao <yxiao@mit.edu>,
>>> "[BLAST_ANAWARE]" <Blast_anaware@rocko.lns.mit.edu>
>>> Subject: Re: unfilled nwl/r and hwl/r
>>>
>>> Hi Mike and All,
>>> This needs to be fixed ASAP... I can't trust any lrd
>>> recrunches if this is always going to be the case that
>>> nwl/r or hwl/r is not included. As it turns out, v17
>>> 2005 data is missing these as well and means that my
>>> recrunched 2005 GEN analysis is completely untrustworthy.
>>>
>>> Thanks Yuan for noticing this... I took it for granted
>>> that this was an old issue. If the whole reconstruction
>>> is re-done, what is so hard about accessing these values?
>>> I wish I was part of the collaboration earlier so I'd
>>> have a better understanding of our software, and I'd fix
>>> these problems...
>>>
>>> -e
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Quoting Michael Kohl <kohlm@mit.edu>:
>>>
>>>> Hi Yuan,
>>>>
>>>> I'm doubting that this happens on purpose. Chris, can you comment?
>>>> The used crunch command was
>>>> "lrd -ff +nw +pid +epsk +SQL Geometry.File=blast.geom.2004"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On your access of blast_anaware mailing list, please contact Barbara
>>>> Santorella <bsantore@MIT.EDU>.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Michael
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Yuan Xiao wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi, Michael,
>>>>>
>>>>> From recrunch version 16, nwl/r and hwl/r have not been filled.
>>>>> Is this on purpose? or is there something wrong?
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW, I'm not authorized to send emails to "[BLAST_ANAWARE]"
>>>>> <Blast_anaware@rocko.lns.mit.edu>. Can u help me with this?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks and regards,
>>>>> Yuan
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> +-------------------------------------+--------------------------+
>>>> | Office: | Home: |
>>>> |-------------------------------------|--------------------------|
>>>> | Dr. Michael Kohl | Michael Kohl |
>>>> | Laboratory for Nuclear Science | 5 Ibbetson Street |
>>>> | MIT-Bates Linear Accelerator Center | Somerville, MA 02143 |
>>>> | Middleton, MA 01949 | U.S.A. |
>>>> | U.S.A. | |
>>>> | - - - - - - - - - - - - | - - - - - - - - -|
>>>> | Email: kohlm@mit.edu | K.Michael.Kohl@gmx.de |
>>>> | Work: +1-617-253-9207 | Home: +1-617-629-3147 |
>>>> | Fax: +1-617-253-9599 | Mobile: +1-978-580-4190 |
>>>> | http://blast.lns.mit.edu | |
>>>> +-------------------------------------+--------------------------+
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ----
>>> Eugene Geis
>>> PhD Student, Physics Department, ASU
>>> Research Affiliate, MIT-Bates Laboratory of Nuclear Science
>>> eugene.geis@asu.edu
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ----
>>> http://quickreaction.blogspot.com
>>
>>
>
>
>
+-------------------------------------+--------------------------+
| Office: | Home: |
|-------------------------------------|--------------------------|
| Dr. Michael Kohl | Michael Kohl |
| Laboratory for Nuclear Science | 5 Ibbetson Street |
| MIT-Bates Linear Accelerator Center | Somerville, MA 02143 |
| Middleton, MA 01949 | U.S.A. |
| U.S.A. | |
| - - - - - - - - - - - - | - - - - - - - - -|
| Email: kohlm@mit.edu | K.Michael.Kohl@gmx.de |
| Work: +1-617-253-9207 | Home: +1-617-629-3147 |
| Fax: +1-617-253-9599 | Mobile: +1-978-580-4190 |
| http://blast.lns.mit.edu | |
+-------------------------------------+--------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:33 EST