Re: [BLAST_ANAWARE] BlastLib2 version question

From: Chris Crawford (chris2@lns.mit.edu)
Date: Sat Jun 14 2003 - 23:22:05 EDT


Adrian T Sindile wrote:

>Hi, Chi!
>
>
>
>>just about any version of BlastLib2 should work with MC, but not sure
>>about lrn.C in respect to reading MC polarization.
>>I guess the easiest way to check is to call TBLRaw::MCprint() to dump
>>a few events. It is almost at the lowest level we can go to and should
>>reflect the data most faithfully.
>>
>>
>
>Thanks, that should do it!
>
>For merging epel and DGen, I guess we'll do it when we get to it...
>personally I am happy with Chris' epel and don't think I need any merger. :-)
>
i'm looking forward to a 'DGepel'. it will be a good time to add
radiative corrections as well.
--chris

>After I look into this Monte Carlo epel asymmetry (project of my own
>choosing), I want to start digging more into the TOF and BAT digitization
>- and I am pretty sure all people have their hands full... so merging two
>codes does not seem to have a high priority right now anyway.
>
>Adrian
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 14:07:29 EST